Components to Capability – Bringing Integrated Governance to life

At our recent Business Integrated Governance Book Club, we started to discuss the Components needed to operate effective integrated governance.

There is a lot of material about Components. The first sessions covers Organisation and Governance (another blog to follow)

Moreover – I think that instead of open discussions to talk about components – which we certainly must define so we can build them – what we really need to achieve is CAPABILITY.

Think of it this way – if the Components are the infrastructure, the Capabilities are what the organisation can reliably do because that infrastructure exists. In project and programme management terms – defining Components gives us ‘Outputs’, Capability is more ‘Outcomes’.

The following section presents a viewpoint on how the Components Support Capability. In a Business Integrated Governance environment. This is where the generic language of BIG needs to give way the the local language of the organisation. How should this sound for your situation?

1. Strategic Coherence

Primary BIG components involved:

• Leadership – sets direction, frames trade-offs, protects strategic intent from drift
• Information – defines the Strategy Information Model linking drivers, objectives and initiatives
• Data – provides evidence on whether strategic hypotheses are holding
• Organisation – aligns structure to value creation logic

Supported by:

• Strategic intent assets
• Strategy Information Model
• Controlled taxonomy
• Strategy Operating Model

If coherence is weak, it is usually a Leadership and Information design issue, not a communication problem.

Capability enabled:

The organisation can translate purpose into a bounded set of objectives and keep them stable long enough to act on them. It can explain why work exists. It can show cause-and-effect logic between choices and outcomes.

Without this, strategy becomes a slogan or an annual presentation.

2. Objective Ownership and Accountability

Primary BIG components involved:

• Accountability – explicit ownership of objectives, risks and performance
• Organisation – defined units with clear responsibility boundaries
• Governance – decision forums that reinforce ownership rather than dilute it
• Leadership – holds the line on consequences

Supported by:

• Organisational design assets
• Defined accountable roles
• Governance architecture
• Clear decision rights

Where this breaks down, Accountability is often nominal rather than structurally embedded.

Capability enabled:

Every strategic objective has a named owner who can act, allocate, escalate and be held to account. Meetings end with decisions and named follow-through. Accountability survives beyond the room.

Without this, objectives float around as shared aspirations.

3. Portfolio Prioritisation and Trade-off Management

Primary BIG components involved:

• Governance – structured forums for prioritisation and reallocation
• Information – visible portfolio linked to objectives
• Data – cost, capacity and performance evidence
• Business Support – facilitation of planning and reforecast cycles
• Leadership – willingness to stop work

Weak trade-off discipline is usually a Governance and Business Support gap.

Supported by:

• Portfolio spine – operational, change and value creation
• Prioritisation criteria linked to strategy
• Capacity visibility
• Governance decision forums

Capability enabled:

The organisation can decide what not to do at each level in its hierarchy, and at each major point in its governance framework. It can reallocate capital and management attention in-year. It can balance performance today with investment for tomorrow.

This is often the first capability that breaks under growth pressure.

4. Decision Velocity with Control

Primary BIG components involved:

• Governance – defined decision rights, Terms of Reference, escalation pathways
• Accountability – clarity on who decides versus who advises
• Information – structured, objective-linked reporting
• Assurance – independent confidence without paralysing delivery

When governance slows the organisation, it is often because these components are misaligned.

Supported by:

• Defined governance bodies
• Terms of Reference with authority boundaries
• Escalation pathways
• Structured agendas tied to objectives
• Reliable and fast information management

Capability enabled:

Decisions are made at the right level, at the right time, with the right information (at the right time – collated with affordable expense). Escalations are deliberate rather than political. Governance accelerates rather than stalls delivery.

Without infrastructure, decisions either centralise excessively or fragment.

5. Performance Management Across Domains

Primary BIG components involved:

• Data – consistent measures across domains
• Information – integration of operational, financial and change metrics
• Business Support – production of integrated reporting
• Governance – performance conversations anchored to objectives
• Accountability – named owners for results

If performance is fragmented, the weakness typically sits in Information architecture and Data discipline.

Supported by:

• Strategy Information Model
• Measures linked to objectives
• Integrated reporting
• Delivery performance data

Capability enabled:

Leaders can see whether ALL objectives are being met, not just whether projects are progressing. Performance discussions connect operational, financial and change data.

This is the shift from activity management to outcome management.

6. Integrated Risk Management

Primary BIG components involved:

• Assurance – structured review and challenge
• Governance – risk discussion embedded in decision forums
• Accountability – clear risk ownership
• Information – risk linked explicitly to objectives
• Leadership – tone on transparency

Compliance-driven risk management usually reflects a separation between Assurance and Governance.

Supported by:

• Enterprise risk model linked to objectives
• Risk ownership
• Assurance mapping to governance

Capability enabled:

Risks are assessed in terms of their impact on strategic objectives. Mitigations are prioritised accordingly. Assurance activity is focused where exposure is highest.

Risk becomes strategic rather than compliance-driven.

7. Benefit Realisation Discipline

Primary BIG components involved:

• Accountability – benefit owners beyond project closure
• Data – outcome measures defined at initiation
• Information – linkage between initiatives and objectives
• Governance – post-implementation review discipline
• Business Support – maintenance of tracking mechanisms

Where benefits evaporate, Accountability and Governance are usually disengaged after delivery.

Supported by:

• Portfolio lifecycle controls
• Benefit tracking mechanisms
• Formal closure discipline

Capability enabled:

The organisation does not just deliver change – it measures whether the intended benefits materialise. This should not matter whether change is operational (Tactical / minor changes authorised out of local budgets to achieve operational targets) or strategic change (Cross functional change supporting strategic or mission critical objectives which may have central funding.) Underperforming initiatives can be corrected or stopped.

This capability is rare, but it is a marker of maturity.

8. Organisational Learning and Adaptation

Primary BIG components involved:

• Data – reliable performance and risk signals
• Information – structured feedback loops
• Assurance – root cause review
• Governance – formal review cadence
• Leadership – willingness to adjust course

Adaptation fails when Data exists but is not structurally integrated into Governance.

Supported by:

• Data management capability
• Review cycles
• Root cause issue management
• Structured feedback loops

Capability enabled:

The organisation can adjust strategy and allocation based on evidence. Lessons are institutional rather than anecdotal. If work related to one objective becomes more important – is there “smash and grab” for resources, denuding then damaging the less important workloads – or is rebalancing performed while remaining in control. Strategy evolves without losing coherence.

This is what allows agility without chaos.

9. Repeatable Strategy Operation

Primary BIG components involved:

• Business Support – curates the operating model, calendar and processes
• Governance – structured annual and in-year cycles
• Information – maintained and controlled information model
• Organisation – stable accountability infrastructure
• Leadership – reinforces continuity across leadership changes

This is where all BIG components converge. If one component weakens, the operating discipline reverts to personality dependence.

Supported by:

• Strategy Operating Model
• Business support capability
• Governance calendar
• Planning and reforecast processes
• Maintained information model

Capability enabled:

Strategy delivery becomes an operating discipline, not a personality trait of a founder or a particularly strong executive. The system continues to function as leadership rotates.

This is the core BIG ambition – to make the connection from purpose to delivery operational and durable.

Summary

In summary, the infrastructure elements support capabilities in five broad domains:

• coherence
• accountability
• prioritisation
• control
• adaptation

If one of those capabilities is weak, it is usually traceable to missing or poorly maintained infrastructure rather than a lack of effort or intelligence.

A Pattern Worth Noticing:

• Leadership sets direction and tone.
• Organisation and Accountability create structural clarity.
• Governance and Assurance regulate decision quality and control.
• Information and Data provide the evidential backbone.
• Business Support keeps the whole system operational.

When those components are integrated, the organisation gains durable capability.
When they are siloed, infrastructure exists but capability does not.

A few patterns are worth noting.

• Leadership is critical for coherence, trade-offs, risk transparency and adaptation. It sets tone and protects intent.
• Organisation and Accountability are foundational for ownership and structural clarity. Without them, governance becomes theatre.
• Governance appears in almost every row. It is the integrating mechanism that converts information into decisions.
• Information and Data underpin performance, risk and learning. If these are weak, capability collapses under pressure.
• Assurance becomes important where control, risk and learning are involved. It is not a separate layer – it strengthens decision quality.
• Business Support is most visible in prioritisation, performance integration and operating rhythm. It keeps the system functioning.

The final row is telling. Repeatable strategy operation depends on all eight components. Remove one and the system becomes personality-led rather than infrastructure-led.

To access the BIG Body of knowledge, become a Member (free)

To access all materials, (FULL Body of knowledge, Book Club details, Conference Materials, Readiness tools, Accountability Node examples) become a FULL Member (fee – supports the CIC operation)